Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 15:42:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1) Source doesn’t support note that the agency that took the test is unreliable. 2) Even if true that it’s unreliable, Khalif is still XY undisputed, as she or anyone speaking on her behalf has in fact never disputed the claim or claimed she is XX.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822199558073430138
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505
  • createdAtMillis - 1723304534659
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1822199558073430138CA0DB573717446430CF47BD677D2ACD6B4AD10C5D106346EAA492E771C55D505