Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 06:20:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57355648C101E7EBAB55BF1351EAC7CCDC7330818572A569DA38911617A21633
Participant Details

Original Note:

I've tried it myself, and even when I used a source that ChatGPT itself recommended, it did not accept an attempt to assassinate Trump, until I quoted the FBI *in the same article as I linked* to ChatGPT as proof. I've never experienced this stubbornness before. (I used https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/26/politics/fbi-trump-interview-assassination-attempt/index.html )

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822034822803734957
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57355648C101E7EBAB55BF1351EAC7CCDC7330818572A569DA38911617A21633
  • createdAtMillis - 1723270851115
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182203482280373495757355648C101E7EBAB55BF1351EAC7CCDC7330818572A569DA38911617A21633