Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-12 20:14:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E83338197481B2F2C7DFAC4FA13F2827D9DF00A3E966A3524890D6C9495F86F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Max Davie misstated the objectives and observations of the Cass Review, as well as misreading underlying data used to inform its findings. A point-by-point correction can be found here: https://x.com/benryanwriter/status/1821653395096076619?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821835950793580970
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E83338197481B2F2C7DFAC4FA13F2827D9DF00A3E966A3524890D6C9495F86F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1723493689198
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821835950793580970E83338197481B2F2C7DFAC4FA13F2827D9DF00A3E966A3524890D6C9495F86F1