Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 00:18:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Without evidence" means Vance is accusing Walz without providing proof. It doesn't imply that no evidence exists, just that Vance hasn't presented any to support his claim. https://cmsimpact.org/code/set-principles-fair-use-journalism/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821699251874955283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1723162727894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18216992518749552833E83F10C6B61A1A019D1786C5F3D0D923A929E4A6D0A1C42A34708B690B0C9B0