Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 15:42:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADC97F576BA41FFAB5310A6F78B547967331EFB063F61919A824B77CDB1EF9FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The Cass review has not been peer reviewed The review commissioned research, this received some peer review. The review itself - interpretations of those studies, conclusions drawn, & the recommendations made were not in any way peer reviewed Don't abuse CN to mislead https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821572048444915948
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADC97F576BA41FFAB5310A6F78B547967331EFB063F61919A824B77CDB1EF9FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1723131722426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1821572048444915948ADC97F576BA41FFAB5310A6F78B547967331EFB063F61919A824B77CDB1EF9FF