Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-08 12:00:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E16AA12116823116465AD18D75DE60C7313F29DA4E1B3642DAAD05B725C9F9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

記事は「著作権者の同意なく画像を機械学習に使用した」ことを認めるものですが、その行為が必ずしも「著作権侵害」となるわけではない事に注意が必要です。 実際、これに関連したアーティストによる著作権訴訟では、その訴えが棄却されています。 https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/judge-pares-down-artists-ai-copyright-lawsuit-against-midjourney-stability-ai-2023-10-30/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1821496734411018517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E16AA12116823116465AD18D75DE60C7313F29DA4E1B3642DAAD05B725C9F9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1723118405989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18214967344110185177E16AA12116823116465AD18D75DE60C7313F29DA4E1B3642DAAD05B725C9F9A