Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 15:36:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5779224ED6B4DD27311FA36C0F822B5EF0B39A1DE86B2DAF9209C97E86C52E36
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não existe necessidade de nota nesse tweet, basta a pessoa saber interpretar uma frase pra ver que na manchete DIZ SIM que o atirador era uma VÍTIMA de um ASSALTO. Parem de usar as notas pra reescrever tweet por puro capricho.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820612596619248018
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5779224ED6B4DD27311FA36C0F822B5EF0B39A1DE86B2DAF9209C97E86C52E36
  • createdAtMillis - 1723044991490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18206125966192480185779224ED6B4DD27311FA36C0F822B5EF0B39A1DE86B2DAF9209C97E86C52E36