Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 13:03:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3EED8488413DB52F6A0FDF9619E9E06B48621DCB3DA73E420C22FEA68CE2A438
Participant Details

Original Note:

The percentage in the post is based on the estimate from this recent article which tried to estimate secondary deaths. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext This number is misleading: it is actually a conservative estimate. Based on the article, the real number is likely higher.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810233269205569696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3EED8488413DB52F6A0FDF9619E9E06B48621DCB3DA73E420C22FEA68CE2A438
  • createdAtMillis - 1720443796097
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18102332692055696963EED8488413DB52F6A0FDF9619E9E06B48621DCB3DA73E420C22FEA68CE2A438