Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-24 18:34:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C8D69157683044E237724E8145BF5358EB6516A00704AEA4A4936B2B5148F19
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. In addition to the reasons already cited why no CN is needed, the proposed CN is incorrect in saying "No factual basis supporting the claims have been presented". Grand jury testimony from the victim and others has been released, along with call logs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808712554795184563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C8D69157683044E237724E8145BF5358EB6516A00704AEA4A4936B2B5148F19
  • createdAtMillis - 1724524489677
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18087125547951845637C8D69157683044E237724E8145BF5358EB6516A00704AEA4A4936B2B5148F19