Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 15:13:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00C8EADD88D768189205EC797F8F559E06C99B8EFF2A6EF484155D9AD459F23E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While all three emphasized the importance of the rule of law and that judges must follow legal precedent - this is not a quote from any confirmation hearing. Further, the conclusion that this ruling favored a single president over the rule of law is a spurious claim. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/07/01/politics/presidents-immunity-supreme-court-what-matters

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808502732858216699
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00C8EADD88D768189205EC797F8F559E06C99B8EFF2A6EF484155D9AD459F23E
  • createdAtMillis - 1720019602361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180850273285821669900C8EADD88D768189205EC797F8F559E06C99B8EFF2A6EF484155D9AD459F23E