Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 20:55:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The intention of this post is to point out that the precedent set by SCOTUS has legal consequences comparable to a constitutional amendment. While the latter requires broad political consensus, the former was achieved by the opinion of only 6 justices.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808172481049776274
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1719953724525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180817248104977627413829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0