Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 15:09:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A25FC959636F92DC0EE2795616CE8AFD99C8889059589257EB5CB3DE1B2E495
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misrepresentation of a recent Supreme Court decision. The Court ruled that former presidents have immunity for official acts, but not for unofficial or criminal acts. It did not rule that all acts in which a president exercises power are legal. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/supreme-court-rules-trump-presidential-immunity-case/5557572/?hl=en-IE

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1808121915061514659
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0A25FC959636F92DC0EE2795616CE8AFD99C8889059589257EB5CB3DE1B2E495
createdAtMillis - 1720019392794
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18081219150615146590A25FC959636F92DC0EE2795616CE8AFD99C8889059589257EB5CB3DE1B2E495