Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 01:04:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 944A8576CF1DFC19C2E577D5324C3DA3913F023B5CF964515AD02E665F54139D
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the Supreme Court doesn't specify what qualifies as an official act and the dissenting opinion is that the majority opinion will give the president immunity from political assinations, then this is in no way an unreasonable opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807913254456643780
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 944A8576CF1DFC19C2E577D5324C3DA3913F023B5CF964515AD02E665F54139D
  • createdAtMillis - 1719882261700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807913254456643780944A8576CF1DFC19C2E577D5324C3DA3913F023B5CF964515AD02E665F54139D