Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 01:32:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 288FA158A6219F71432BA76ED36554A17B65B65E7E30389ACC7F40CD4F86DB2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court did not say this and it is stated as a fact. It stated a President could be immune from official acts. This is hyperbole and click-bait for self promotion. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4733839-supreme-court-trump-immunity-case/damp/?nxs-test=damp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807866861994102845
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 288FA158A6219F71432BA76ED36554A17B65B65E7E30389ACC7F40CD4F86DB2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1719883953614
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1807866861994102845288FA158A6219F71432BA76ED36554A17B65B65E7E30389ACC7F40CD4F86DB2A