Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 15:04:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A25FC959636F92DC0EE2795616CE8AFD99C8889059589257EB5CB3DE1B2E495
Participant Details

Original Note:

While a bit simplistic, the 1st statement is vague enough that it doesn't completely mischaracterize the Court's holding. As to the claim that the Clinton campaign was poorly run, which was at least partly responsible for her loss: it's surely at least a reasonable opinion. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/hillary-clinton-election-president-loss

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807860817594835191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A25FC959636F92DC0EE2795616CE8AFD99C8889059589257EB5CB3DE1B2E495
  • createdAtMillis - 1720019091385
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078608175948351910A25FC959636F92DC0EE2795616CE8AFD99C8889059589257EB5CB3DE1B2E495