Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 19:33:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's misleading to indirectly imply that the SCOTUS ruling grants total immunity. In fact, the ruling states the opposite: presidents are NOT immune from prosecution for their private acts, but are immune when it comes to official acts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States_(2024)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807831150074663356
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1719862382059
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180783115007466335613829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0