Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-29 22:06:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78A51A2DE718A3D4E48A11B55020E34DD8D474A46E926EA85FE6A2EF092567C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court did not "remove oversight" for anything. The Chevron Doctrine has been effectively dead for quite a while now. SCOTUS merely made it official. Courts are no longer required to defer to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous laws. The laws still apply. https://ballotpedia.org/Chevron_deference_(doctrine)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806768506077122815
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78A51A2DE718A3D4E48A11B55020E34DD8D474A46E926EA85FE6A2EF092567C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1719698787557
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180676850607712281578A51A2DE718A3D4E48A11B55020E34DD8D474A46E926EA85FE6A2EF092567C4