Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-26 15:24:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29
Participant Details

Original Note:

This case is about the interpretation of a federal criminal statute and its application to state and local officials. It does not hold that accepting money after a certain act is okay. It might NOT be okay under state or local laws. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-108_8n5a.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805980197428056423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29
  • createdAtMillis - 1719415494587
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180598019742805642301EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29