Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-25 02:41:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54E197AF3590BAA0E4BCCF0D9E2179BBF056EDAE08147B9B22D1644E37D66EC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

誤解を招く投稿ですが「ワークマン男子」とは、日本経済新聞の記者が個人的な感想として付けた名前で、ワークマンの新しい店舗やブランド名でもない事に注意が必要です 参照 https://www.workman.co.jp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1805385764349657591
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54E197AF3590BAA0E4BCCF0D9E2179BBF056EDAE08147B9B22D1644E37D66EC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1719283307340
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180538576434965759154E197AF3590BAA0E4BCCF0D9E2179BBF056EDAE08147B9B22D1644E37D66EC8