Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-19 07:07:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FD03DBDAFAA59BE1589221F820A47620E46D9B8A4AB83D1645E78D9EB8687CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

They claim they paid £144k for the company to carry out the vetting. No evidence gave against that. It's an assumption to say this didn't occur and that the only service they could have possibly have had was to vet people themselves on the platform. Other tweets are not a source.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1803099852781330867
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FD03DBDAFAA59BE1589221F820A47620E46D9B8A4AB83D1645E78D9EB8687CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1718780851617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18030998527813308670FD03DBDAFAA59BE1589221F820A47620E46D9B8A4AB83D1645E78D9EB8687CB