Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-17 13:38:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93F38A707642B8EB7795705FA72206F5A1A2D99602D06E8B3AD19E1ED2230DB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Report is not full of bad science. It is the most thorough independent review of the topic yet undertaken. It has been praised and accepted by groups on all sides of the debate including Stonewall, the Labour Party and the BMJ. https://www.stonewall.org.uk/about-us/news/stonewall-statement-cass-review https://x.com/wesstreeting/status/1777835770184634751?lang=en-GB https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q837

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1802686214761242823
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93F38A707642B8EB7795705FA72206F5A1A2D99602D06E8B3AD19E1ED2230DB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1718631502445
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180268621476124282393F38A707642B8EB7795705FA72206F5A1A2D99602D06E8B3AD19E1ED2230DB7