Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 16:37:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A3C263FC89C6385CB7F404ADD43140DE9F7175002E752D728135F311014B3473
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note is irrelevant to the Supreme Court’s decision which hinged upon whether the ATF had the authority to expand the definition of “machine gun” to include bump stocks on semi-automatic guns. Further, objects mustn’t be “animate” to be dangerous (e.g. bombs).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801741234160984416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A3C263FC89C6385CB7F404ADD43140DE9F7175002E752D728135F311014B3473
  • createdAtMillis - 1718469461874
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801741234160984416A3C263FC89C6385CB7F404ADD43140DE9F7175002E752D728135F311014B3473