Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 22:16:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 068C17A015BBB2CB05B062A7EDAC8D6FF3E990BD4C3622AE1632CDC5B8AA35C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La note de la Commission des sondages date d'il y a plusieurs années et est désormais caduque. La méthodologie utilisée par Cluster 17 depuis cette époque n'a, à ce jour, fait l'objet d'aucune remarque de la Commission. https://www.commission-des-sondages.fr/hist/communiques/index.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801705331329773934
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 068C17A015BBB2CB05B062A7EDAC8D6FF3E990BD4C3622AE1632CDC5B8AA35C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1718403415441
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801705331329773934068C17A015BBB2CB05B062A7EDAC8D6FF3E990BD4C3622AE1632CDC5B8AA35C1