Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 10:44:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F3B8449F772C24765C82F6FE1F6089EF80C3F7D9234462DA1BD52D5C33DF90A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court did not forbid Congress from banning bump stocks, nor did it express an opinion on the merits of a bump-stock ban. The Court held that the current law does not give the ATF statutory authority to ban bump stocks. Congress can change the law and ban bump stocks. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4722204-alito-congress-ban-bump-stocks/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801654097671565323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F3B8449F772C24765C82F6FE1F6089EF80C3F7D9234462DA1BD52D5C33DF90A
  • createdAtMillis - 1718448269560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18016540976715653237F3B8449F772C24765C82F6FE1F6089EF80C3F7D9234462DA1BD52D5C33DF90A