Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 06:53:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98A18DE9416E7E84FBB35C5EFCB408C9CB6575B0E971E0FEBEF53BFD70BE2E77
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. É completamente irrelevante a informação sobre o avô do deputado. 2. O fato do Estado ser laico não impede o deputado de votar com base em sua religião (até porque muitos de seus eleitores votaram nele pela religião dele, e estarão sendo representados). 3. Sem comentários.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801407331344748871
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98A18DE9416E7E84FBB35C5EFCB408C9CB6575B0E971E0FEBEF53BFD70BE2E77
  • createdAtMillis - 1718348033827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180140733134474887198A18DE9416E7E84FBB35C5EFCB408C9CB6575B0E971E0FEBEF53BFD70BE2E77