Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-15 20:30:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3956336A9F2C07F55C4C60AC5C0A8A611B17BC00F8DCB5E025BBFDEF389FD211
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. É completamente irrelevante a informação sobre o avô do deputado. 2. O fato do Estado ser laico não impede o deputado de votar com base em sua religião (até porque muitos de seus eleitores votaram nele pela religião dele, e estarão sendo representados). 3. Sem comentários.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801407331344748871
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3956336A9F2C07F55C4C60AC5C0A8A611B17BC00F8DCB5E025BBFDEF389FD211
  • createdAtMillis - 1718483441629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18014073313447488713956336A9F2C07F55C4C60AC5C0A8A611B17BC00F8DCB5E025BBFDEF389FD211