Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 15:51:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75EB58D62D1F0D20DAD2BC3A5B508DDC866EA557E42F932D1A9CC66047AB0642
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note is valid - people here need to understand the concept of “additional information”. It is a concept of the CN’s, they add additional context that is specifically going unsaid in a statement. It is part of CN’s and dressing it up as an “opinion” is counter intuitive https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68494168.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801273771648590179
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75EB58D62D1F0D20DAD2BC3A5B508DDC866EA557E42F932D1A9CC66047AB0642
  • createdAtMillis - 1718380278741
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180127377164859017975EB58D62D1F0D20DAD2BC3A5B508DDC866EA557E42F932D1A9CC66047AB0642