Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 01:07:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C97CA5DDA11257A1EF09D05B119AD23FA6E96BB190E5FE7D739D121F3E15E7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

続くリプライにて根拠となる論文に言及したポストが示されています。 https://x.com/HarrySpoelstra/status/1799720288780755165 「客観的データが不十分」はノート執筆者の判断、即ち個人的意見ですので、コミュニティノートは適しません。リプライ機能で意見すべきです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799794140311687471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C97CA5DDA11257A1EF09D05B119AD23FA6E96BB190E5FE7D739D121F3E15E7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1717981637537
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17997941403116874710C97CA5DDA11257A1EF09D05B119AD23FA6E96BB190E5FE7D739D121F3E15E7C