Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 15:56:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3675B975A31DB6B506EB5DEDC26D3923FF902916F802CCDF527BB0A4D17513A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The figure is based in part on assumptions made by Conservative appointed special advisers, and is disputed. The assumption that any spending would have to be funded by personal taxation is incorrect. The figure is presented as annual, when it would be spread over four years. https://fullfact.org/economy/conservative-claim-general-election-labour-2000-tax-increase/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799710929782772000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3675B975A31DB6B506EB5DEDC26D3923FF902916F802CCDF527BB0A4D17513A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717948602515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799710929782772000E3675B975A31DB6B506EB5DEDC26D3923FF902916F802CCDF527BB0A4D17513A