Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 14:05:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6727B8CB465D9305B5BF8A4AB072BD603006AFAA1EC353255C7E600DF1C41899
Participant Details

Original Note:

La notica engaña al lector. El juez peinado no está imputado. Y así se dice en la propia noticia. El plural engaña al lector con un titular manipulado https://www.elplural.com/politica/tsjm-admite-querella-contra-juez-peinado-revelacion-secretos_331411102

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799554107088199982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6727B8CB465D9305B5BF8A4AB072BD603006AFAA1EC353255C7E600DF1C41899
  • createdAtMillis - 1717941932097
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17995541070881999826727B8CB465D9305B5BF8A4AB072BD603006AFAA1EC353255C7E600DF1C41899