Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 10:58:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

La notica engaña al lector. El juez peinado no está imputado. Y así se dice en la propia noticia. El plural engaña al lector con un titular manipulado https://www.elplural.com/politica/tsjm-admite-querella-contra-juez-peinado-revelacion-secretos_331411102

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799554107088199982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1717930699307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799554107088199982324A16C53881B6C6899109D3E9566F9C10C075F42D5DC12194726B2CDF4C77DA