Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 03:30:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73C2A95585CE8106A4BE2B5F83BF1CB2C5523DF8A8D6E8B26091306AB7B555FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note claims the clause is a regulatory requirement, but does not provide an actual legal source. It just takes popular social network as examples. The opinion it should have more tailored legal terms as a professional service is valid and does not need a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799262803414618509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73C2A95585CE8106A4BE2B5F83BF1CB2C5523DF8A8D6E8B26091306AB7B555FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1717903849138
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179926280341461850973C2A95585CE8106A4BE2B5F83BF1CB2C5523DF8A8D6E8B26091306AB7B555FE