Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-05 22:12:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 79EAB6EECFEA2009D77FA5F7D3CD1DA5DEA4419045DD6D04446F7A93AD0BC684
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - The suggested Note fails to address the original post. The OP does not claim that the figures are solely based on civil service estimates. It presents a clip from a TV debate. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/labour-increase-tax-bill-protect-cash/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/
All Note Details