Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-05 14:17:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0FD03DBDAFAA59BE1589221F820A47620E46D9B8A4AB83D1645E78D9EB8687CB
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - The suggested Notes fail to address the original post. The OP does not claim that the figures are solely based on civil service estimates. Instead, it cites genuine articles from British newspapers. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/labour-increase-tax-bill-protect-cash/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/
All Note Details