Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-22 09:49:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AE7987AF57EC2061E4FDDE5CD955E0F0E33C61614F6DCB45DDBDF99EC44EEE8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tribunal in Adams v ERCC heard evidence from the centre’s employees that they did not receive threats or need to lock down. They also heard ERCC prioritised the CEO’s wishes over rape survivors’, turned away those who did not conform & refused to refer to other services. https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/adams-vs-edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre?r=1gxdhb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1793205623644905547
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AE7987AF57EC2061E4FDDE5CD955E0F0E33C61614F6DCB45DDBDF99EC44EEE8
  • createdAtMillis - 1716371384548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17932056236449055476AE7987AF57EC2061E4FDDE5CD955E0F0E33C61614F6DCB45DDBDF99EC44EEE8