Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-18 00:45:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qui est avancé par le tweet et l'article du Telegraph, il ne s'agit pas de décider de l'exclusion d'Israël mais d'évaluer la légalité de cette demande en vue d'un examen futur (“This legal assessment [...] will subsequently be forwarded to the Fifa council”) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/05/17/fifa-urgent-meeting-decide-israel-banned-palestine-hamas/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1791531478263755099
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32
  • createdAtMillis - 1715993125119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179153147826375509986D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32