Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-14 18:33:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE5CF7E3E182ED2811A7B4E3272443E1E3651DCAE715D42C4256D30578E5E0B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

additional context: reuters is one of the least biased news sources source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1790393545452384765
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE5CF7E3E182ED2811A7B4E3272443E1E3651DCAE715D42C4256D30578E5E0B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1715711617992
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1790393545452384765AE5CF7E3E182ED2811A7B4E3272443E1E3651DCAE715D42C4256D30578E5E0B4