Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 22:10:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E600788F1B155E3F2F0A64D8D95846BE0A153658B83BCC0230CB985D6BCE6E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dr Proudman is not facing a professional disciplinary tribunal for “campaigning on” access to the Garrick Club but for a tweet thread she wrote attacking a judge and his judicial decision-making in which she used “old boys’ club attitudes” as a figure of speech https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/mar/27/lawyer-boys-club-concerns-judgment-misconduct-case

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1788639324914770295
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E600788F1B155E3F2F0A64D8D95846BE0A153658B83BCC0230CB985D6BCE6E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1715292646272
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17886393249147702950E600788F1B155E3F2F0A64D8D95846BE0A153658B83BCC0230CB985D6BCE6E6