Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-18 10:47:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B7B85A660CB69A005C6F316BF36418C14990310391E2A0F844DE53FCF1A478A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review rated Turban's own research (Turban 2020: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1725) as "low quality". In particular: "No information given on number of participants excluded from analyses due to missing data" and "age and sex were not adjusted for". (Taylor et al. 2024, supplementary table S4) https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326669 https://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/early/2024/04/09/archdischild-2023-326669/DC5/embed/inline-supplementary-material-5.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787074974026461306
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B7B85A660CB69A005C6F316BF36418C14990310391E2A0F844DE53FCF1A478A
  • createdAtMillis - 1729248440466
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17870749740264613067B7B85A660CB69A005C6F316BF36418C14990310391E2A0F844DE53FCF1A478A