Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 12:11:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F68C2C6F8F6F1AF262CAE6D9B5776849F5F633F607240A8E61FD543192D16F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This proposed note references official sources but I see no evidence of what these sources say, who these sources are, and how they are evaluated. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/newsresearch

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785865411340468254
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F68C2C6F8F6F1AF262CAE6D9B5776849F5F633F607240A8E61FD543192D16F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1714651890904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17858654113404682548F68C2C6F8F6F1AF262CAE6D9B5776849F5F633F607240A8E61FD543192D16F0