Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 08:30:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F8AE1115D13ED05E6D53BE440FEBFAA3ED2C88FFEB4C89DDFA471D7C783601
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scrapping the London ULEZ would require an Act of Parliament and therefore no London Mayor could do it on day 1 as is claimed in this post https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-03-22/debates/3C46FF67-F909-4021-87D4-8E91410849F9/GreaterLondonLowEmissionZoneCharging(Amendment)Bill

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785717238219042857
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F8AE1115D13ED05E6D53BE440FEBFAA3ED2C88FFEB4C89DDFA471D7C783601
  • createdAtMillis - 1714638623037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178571723821904285700F8AE1115D13ED05E6D53BE440FEBFAA3ED2C88FFEB4C89DDFA471D7C783601