Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-02 03:08:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95A4504819B7540F4EBF70309B2ACC5C771085267AB57626B6E35C8E8C43947B
Participant Details

Original Note:

1番目がないのに2番目があったとするのは矛盾です。 引用元の記事をどこをどう読めば、町長に落ち度があり加害者の元町議を信ずるに足る要素があったのか、示していないことに留意が必要です。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20240430-IRGZ5336PRCMFLQGJCIBE6IEPU/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1785304344218472863
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95A4504819B7540F4EBF70309B2ACC5C771085267AB57626B6E35C8E8C43947B
  • createdAtMillis - 1714619324836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178530434421847286395A4504819B7540F4EBF70309B2ACC5C771085267AB57626B6E35C8E8C43947B