Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-26 12:18:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA8823BDAF6FDEEF1504CE19799DF67F1EEBE9F0C6FE85C2AD34137C8A6AA65C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This case has nothing to do with ms Heard’s op-ed. The overturn of one of Weinstein’s cases is due to appellate judges determining a legal error had been made in the decision-making pertaining to the issue of “prior bad acts.” He is still convicted of rape in LA. http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783831993811144847
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA8823BDAF6FDEEF1504CE19799DF67F1EEBE9F0C6FE85C2AD34137C8A6AA65C
  • createdAtMillis - 1714133900936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1783831993811144847CA8823BDAF6FDEEF1504CE19799DF67F1EEBE9F0C6FE85C2AD34137C8A6AA65C