Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-29 12:53:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26394B90FA5384500C2001187CD85DE3A526C08D21001A3F3CD1C3C18D5FED90
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article referred to here was retracted in Febuary due to concerns in validity of references, making their conclusions unreliable. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10897748/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783820816955638017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26394B90FA5384500C2001187CD85DE3A526C08D21001A3F3CD1C3C18D5FED90
  • createdAtMillis - 1714395223993
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178382081695563801726394B90FA5384500C2001187CD85DE3A526C08D21001A3F3CD1C3C18D5FED90