Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-25 19:29:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49E58E6249B388D2F9D72FC7C1390606F8D7D2BA3D99BD4A09DD170F6E883873
Participant Details

Original Note:

Since this was a libel case, claimants did not need to prove that they had suffered any loss. https://www.humphreys.co.uk/articles/defamation-elements-of-a-claim/#:~:text=In%20libel%20claims%2C%20the%20claimant,proved%20in%20claims%20for%20slander.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783545890357035209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49E58E6249B388D2F9D72FC7C1390606F8D7D2BA3D99BD4A09DD170F6E883873
  • createdAtMillis - 1714073378062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178354589035703520949E58E6249B388D2F9D72FC7C1390606F8D7D2BA3D99BD4A09DD170F6E883873