Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 15:45:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5CC4320B4FDC1070EEA7ECC1A89256AFC1508EF129FD6ABD19E79EA595BFD71
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author fails to disclose that this document is a defense motion to compel discovery (see docket below). It's written by the defense and contains their own characterizations of events. The redacted portions refer to events that would identify witness by context. https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/7996521f-5a2b-4595-98f8-32701c5234bf.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_39

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1782545591102308816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5CC4320B4FDC1070EEA7ECC1A89256AFC1508EF129FD6ABD19E79EA595BFD71
  • createdAtMillis - 1713887120808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1782545591102308816D5CC4320B4FDC1070EEA7ECC1A89256AFC1508EF129FD6ABD19E79EA595BFD71