Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-20 22:15:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 274DAD7ACA72ACB8B530D20C3D9B796DF0E30AF699652F95EC271AB44B94E403
Participant Details

Original Note:

The CN above accuses the tweet of speculation, but the note and sources don't concretely refute it. Thus the note is just as speculative as the tweet and is not helpful.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1781715722000814194
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 274DAD7ACA72ACB8B530D20C3D9B796DF0E30AF699652F95EC271AB44B94E403
  • createdAtMillis - 1713651342082
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1781715722000814194274DAD7ACA72ACB8B530D20C3D9B796DF0E30AF699652F95EC271AB44B94E403