Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-04-17 02:57:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DA93FFF3755EE564FB27ACD82B5441E8104175E5F866EF182CED6BF16BB92E78
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - not only is citing the Cass Report as proof of the Cass Reports reliability circular reasoning and therefore invalid, but it is not widely recognized as reliable by peers. It's clearly a politically motivated report, and so is it's support. https://www.advocate.com/health/hilary-cass-nhs-report-debunked https://transactual.org.uk/blog/2024/04/11/press-release-the-cass-review-is-bad-science-and-should-not-be-taken-seriously-by-policymakers/ https://uncommon-scents.blogspot.com/2024/04/opinion-cass-review-and-trans.html?m=1 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/drrobagnew_bad-news-for-our-trans-youth-this-morning-activity-7183695620790980608-dOSs
All Note Details