Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-17 12:01:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90ED69A9CC9B129B162DD5C6BF3E399F08CDC473566062EAA4CAEBC5C838CC8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

A juíza foi, de fato, afastada pelo CNJ. Nota irrelevante e formulada por uma pessoa que tem total desconhecimento da interpretação, tanto jurídica, quanto de texto. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/amp/poder/2024/04/corregedor-do-cnj-afasta-gabriela-hardt-titular-da-vara-da-lava-jato-e-outros-2-juizes.shtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1780005655421583738
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90ED69A9CC9B129B162DD5C6BF3E399F08CDC473566062EAA4CAEBC5C838CC8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1713355282724
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178000565542158373890ED69A9CC9B129B162DD5C6BF3E399F08CDC473566062EAA4CAEBC5C838CC8E