Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 19:42:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D267BC3DF325567CCDF4EFA7A0C218AD12A3326B4E4F8D074482482CE38969E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - above note on nullification would be true if jury did this through their own choice and without being influenced. However, attempting to exert influence over a jury in order to achieve this IS tampering, which is what is being referred to in the post

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779939229713273044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D267BC3DF325567CCDF4EFA7A0C218AD12A3326B4E4F8D074482482CE38969E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1713210136874
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779939229713273044D267BC3DF325567CCDF4EFA7A0C218AD12A3326B4E4F8D074482482CE38969E9